Methodology
spotlight topic:
4.b. Methodology
Published 11 June 2021 | 11 November 2022
- Di Girolamo N and Meursinge Reynders R (2016) Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals. PeerJ, 4:e1649. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1649
- Sargeant, J.M. et al. (2022) Watch your language: An exploration of the use of causal wording in veterinary observational research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 9, no. 1004801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1004801
- Wareham, K.J. e al (2017) Sample size and number of outcome measures of veterinary randomised controlled trials of pharmaceutical interventions funded by different sources, a cross-sectional study. BMC Veterinary Research, 13, 295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1207-0
- Gibbs, N. H. (2021) Reasons for exclusion of apparently healthy mature adult and senior dogs from a clinical trial. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, no. 528 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.651698
- Brown, D.C. (2007) Sources and handling of losses to follow-up in parallel-group randomized clinical trials in dogs and cats: 63 trials (2000–2005). American Journal of Veterinary Research, 68 (7), pp. 694-698. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.7.694
- Lund, E.M., James, K.M. and Neaton, J.D. (1998) Veterinary randomized clinical trial reporting: a review of the small animal literature. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 12 (2), pp. 57-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.1998.tb02095.x
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!